Donald Trump doubles down on Clinton and judge (Full CNN Interview)


ATTACKS AT THE DEMOCRATIC FRONT-RUNNER. HILLARY CLINTON WAS GIVING A SPEECH AND HAD SOME VERY TOUGH THINGS TO SAY ABOUT YOU. >>SHE WAS READING A SPEECH THAT WAS WRITTEN BY OTHER PEOPLE. OKAY? BUT GO AHEAD. SOUND BITES. >>ONE OF THE THINGS SHE SAID IS IT’S NOT HARD TO IMAGINE DONALD TRUMP LEADING US INTO WAR BECAUSE SOMEONE GOT UNDER HIS VERY THIN SKIN. WHAT’S YOUR RESPONSE TO THAT?>>WELL, I DON’T HAVE THIN SKIN. I HAVE VERY STRONG AND THICK SKIN. IF YOU DO A REPORT AND IT’S NOT NECESSARILY POSITIVE BUT, YOU’RE RIGHT, I NEVER COMPLAIN. I DO COMPLAIN WHEN IT’S A LIE OR WHEN IT’S WRONG. BUT I HAVE A STRONG TEMPERAMENT AND IT’S A VERY GOOD TEMPERAMENT AND IT’S IN A VERY IN CONTROL TEMPERAMENT OR I WOULDN’T HAVE BUILT ALL OF THIS WONDERFUL COMPANY AND NUMBER ONE BEST SELLERS, ONE OF THE BEST-SELLING BOOKS OF ALL-TIME, TREMENDOUS TELEVISION SUCCESS. WAIT A MINUTE, JAKE. I’VE BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN EVERY BUSINESS I’VE BEEN IN, IF YOU THINK. REAL ESTATE, ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL. TELEVISION, “THE APPRENTICE.” NBC CAME TO ME AND WANTED TO RENEW SO BADLY — >>WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH TEMPERAMENT.>>YOU CAN’T HAVE THAT SUCCESS WITHOUT GOOD TEMPERAMENT. AND I WILL SAY THAT, I WAS THINKING ABOUT THE WORD TEMPERAMENT. WE NEED A STRONG TEMPERAMENT IN THIS COUNTRY. WE HAVE BEEN LED BY WEAK AND INEFFECTIVE PEOPLE. COUNTRIES HAVE I TAKEN ADVANTAG OF US. WE HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE BY EVERYBODY. I HAVE A VERY STRONG TEMPERAMENT BUT I HAVE A TEMPERAMENT THAT’S UNDER CONTROL. SHE SAYS I’LL BRING US INTO WAR. SHE WANTED TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ. SHE RAISED HER HAND. I SAID, I DON’T WANT TO GO INTO IRAQ. IRAQ IS GOING TO DESTABILIZE THE MIDDLE EAST AND I WAS 100% RIGHT. >>I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE COMMENTS YOU MADE ABOUT THE JUDGE IN THE TRUMP UNIVERSITY CASE. YOU SAID YOU THOUGHT IT WAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT HE’S THE JUDGE BECAUSE HE’S OF MEXICAN HERITAGE EVEN THOUGH HE’S FROM INDIANA. HILLARY CLINTON SAID THAT — >>HERE’S A WOMAN WHO SHOULD BE PUT IN JAIL FOR HER E-MAILS. LET ME JUST SAY, FIRST OFF, I HAVE A CASE WHERE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE HAVE TAKEN THIS COURSE, THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE HAVE SAID GREAT REVIEWS, GREAT REVIEWS. FORTUNATELY, JUST ABOUT EVERYBODY THAT TOOK THE CASE HAS SIGNED A REVIEW, AN EVALUATION, THEY CALL IT. AND IT’S GOTTEN TREMENDOUS MARKS. I DON’T MEAN TWO PEOPLE. THOUSANDS.>>RIGHT. >>I HAVE A SITUATION WHERE THE WOMAN THAT BROUGHT THE CASE BROUGHT THE CASE. SHE’S THE PLAINTIFF. SHE WAS DEPOSED. SHE WAS FOUND TO BE A DISASTER FOR THEM AS A WITNESS BECAUSE SHE GAVE AN EVALUATION THAT WAS LIKE THE BEST EVALUATION YOU’VE EVER HEARD — WAIT JUST ONE SECOND AND SHE DID A TAPE LIKE FROM YOUR CAMERA SAYING THAT THIS SCHOOL WAS FANTASTIC, IT WAS FANTASTIC. THEY WENT TO THE JUDGE AND SAID, URN, WE DON’T WANT HER ANYMORE TO BE OUR PLAINTIFF. THEY SAID, LET’S DISMISS THE CASE. OKAY. LET’S DISMISS THE CASE. HE SAID, I WON’T DISMISS THE CASE AND SHE DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THE PLAINTIFF.>>WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH HERITAGE?>>I’VE HAD RULING AFTER RULING AFTER RULING THAT’S BEEN BAD RULINGS. BEFORE THAT, WE HAD ANOTHER JUDGE. IF HE WAS STILL THERE, THIS CASE WOULD HAVE BEEN OVER TWO YEARS AGO. I’VE HAD TERRIBLE RULINGS, I’VE BEEN TREATED VERY UNFAIRLY. THIS JUDGE IS OF MEXICAN HERITAGE. I’M BUILDING A WALL. >>SO NO MEXICAN JUDGE COULD EVER BE INVOLVED IN A CASE THAT INVOLVES YOU?>>A MEMBER OF SOCIETY, VERY PRO-MEXICO, THAT’S ALL FINE BUT — >>YOU’RE CALLING IN TO QUESTION HIS HERITAGE. >>DOES HE KNOW THE LAWYER ON THE OTHER SIDE? I MEAN, DOES HE KNOW THE LAWYER? YOU KNOW, A LOT OF PEOPLE — >>I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT THAT. >>THAT’S ANOTHER PROBLEM. >>YOU’RE INVOKING HIS RACE TALKING ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT HE CAN DO HIS JOB. >>JAKE, I’M BUILDING A WALL. OKAY? I’M BUILDING A WALL. I’M TRYING TO KEEP BUSINESS OUT OF MEXICO. MEXICO’S FINE. >>BUT HE’S AN AMERICAN. >>HE’S OF MEXICAN HERITAGE AND HE’S VERY PROUD OF IT, AS I AM. >>BUT HE’S AN AMERICAN. YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT’S A CONFLICT OF INTEREST BECAUSE IT’S MEXICO. >>I HAVE A CASE THAT SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISMISSED. I HAVE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE THAT SAY TRUMP UNIVERSITY IS FANTASTIC. I HAVE A JUDGE THAT NEVER, EVER — NOW WE LOSE THE PLAINTIFF. HE LET’S THE PLAINTIFF OF THE CASE OUT. SO WE THOUGHT WE WON THE CASE. >>YOU DISAGREE WITH HIS RULINGS. I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THAT. >>I’VE HAD LAWYERS COME UP TO ME AND SAY YOU ARE BEING TREATED SO UNFAIRLY. THE PLAINTIFFS HAVE ALL SAID WONDERFUL THINGS. YOU KNOW WHY?>>I DON’T WANT TO LITIGATE THE CASE OF TRUMP UNIVERSITY. >>IF HE WAS GIVING ME FAIR RULINGS, I WOULDN’T SAY THAT. I WOULDN’T BE TALKING TO YOU THIS WAY. HE’S GIVEN ME HORRIBLE RULINGS. >>I DON’T CARE IF YOU CRITICIZE HIM. THAT’S FINE. YOU CAN CRITICIZE EVERY DECISION. WHAT I’M SAYING, IF YOU INVOKE HIS RACE AS A REASON ABOUT WHY HE CAN’T DO HIS JOB. >>I THINK THAT’S WHY HE’S DOING IT. >>WHEN HILLARY CLINTON SAYS — >>HILLARY — >>PAUL RYAN TODAY SAID HE DIDN’T CARE THIS IS NOT — THIS IS A CASE THAT I SHOULD HAVE WON. YOU KNOW, THE LAW FIRM PAID HILLARY CLINTON HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO MAKE SPEECHES. YOU KNOW THE LAW FIRM — >>I DO. AND WE REPORTED IT ON MY SHOW.>>OKAY. I’M GLAD. YOU’RE THE ONLY ONE. A LAW FIRM PAID HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS TO HILLARY CLINTON FOR SPEECHES. EVERYONE FELL ASLEEP. >>BEFORE EITHER OF YOU WERE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, THEY DID.>>DO YOU KNOW THEY’VE CONTRIBUTED TREMENDOUS AMOUNTS OF MONEY TO HER CAMPAIGN?>>YES. >>DO YOU KNOW THEY CONTRIBUTED A LOT OF MONEY TO ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN?>>I DID NOT KNOW THAT. >>DID YOU KNOW THEY WENT TO EVERY ATTORNEY GENERAL PRACTICALLY THEY COULD AND THIS CASE WAS TURNED DOWN FROM ALMOST EVERY ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM TEXAS TO FLORIDA AND TO MANY OTHER STATES. >>IS IT NOT, WHEN HILLARY CLINTON SAYS THIS IS A RACIST ATTACK, AND YOU REJECT THAT, IF YOU’RE SAYING HE CAN’T DO HIS JOB BECAUSE OF HIS RACE, IS THAT NOT THE DEFINITION OF RACISM?>>NO. I DON’T THINK SO AT ALL. HE’S PROUD OF HIS HERITAGE.>>YOU SAID HE CAN’T DO HIS JOB BECAUSE OF THAT.>>I’M BUILDING A WALL. I THINK I’M GOING TO DO VERY WELL WITH HISPANICS BECAUSE THEY ARE GOING TO GET JOBS RIGHT NOW. THEY ARE GOING TO GET JOBS. I THINK I’M GOING TO DO VERY WELL WITH HISPANICS. WE ARE BUILDING A WALL. HE’S A MEXICAN. WE’RE BUILDING A WALL BETWEEN HERE AND MEXICO. THE ANSWER IS, HE IS GIVING US VERY UNFAIR RULINGS. RULINGS THAT PEOPLE CAN’T EVEN BELIEVE. THIS CASE SHOULD HAVE ENDED YEARS AGO IN SUMMARY JUDGMENT. THE BEST LAWYERS I HAVE SPOKEN TO SO MANY LAWYERS, THEY SAID, THIS IS NOT A CASE. THIS IS A CASE THAT SHOULD HAVE ENDED. THIS JUDGE IS GIVING US UNFAIR RULINGS. I’M BUILDING A WALL. IT’S A WALL BETWEEN MEXICO. NOT ANOTHER COUNTRY.>>BUT HE’S NOT FROM

Posts created 7387

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top